Publisher's Clippings:


2. Posted 22 November 2005 -

    Is nothing sacred?? 

"The Cigar Shop in the 24-Hour Fitness plaza on E. Bidwell has a giant advertisement in their window showing Santa Claus smoking a cigar.  My friend's 4 year-old spotted it and said, "Look, Mommy, Santa Claus is smoking."    

Aren't there laws against smoking advertisements likely to appeal to children? In any event, does anyone else find it offensive that this store is taking a figure that is beloved by children everywhere, and showing him engaged in a behavior that most parents do not want their children to emulate?  --It seems so cynical and mean-spirited to me, chipping away at the magic and innocence of Santa Claus.  In an adult-themed magazine, such an ad might be okay.  In a window hundreds of children walk by every day, it is thoughtless and tasteless.


BMJ 2009; 339 doi: (Published 16 December 2009)
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b5261

Santa Claus is a well known and loved character, but Nathan Grills and Brendan Halyday question whether he is a healthy role model Santa Claus long ago displaced the Virgin Mary and baby as the most unmistakable Christmas iconography. A recent study among hospital inpatients concluded that awareness of Santa was near universal.1 Given Santa’s fame, he has considerable potential to influence individual and societal behaviour—and not necessarily for good. Santa is a late adopter of evidence based behaviour change and continues to sport a rotund sedentary image. But this is not the only example where Santa’s behaviour and public image are at odds with contemporary accepted public health messages. Eric Schlosser and Morgan Spurlock have both described how McDonald’s used Ronald McDonald to target their products at children by creating an association between McDonald’s food and happy times.2 3 Spurlock showed how Ronald McDonald was more highly recognised than the American president or the Pope.2 Interestingly, Schlosser documents that among American schoolchildren Santa Claus was the only fictional character more highly recognised than Ronald McDonald.3

If Ronald McDonald can be so effective at selling burgers to children, we might expect Santa to be equally effective at selling other goods. After all, it was Santa’s advertising potential that reincarnated simple Saint Nicholas into the glory of a universally recognised icon. Santa’s contemporary image was cemented by the Coca-Cola advertisements that began in the 1930s.4 By the mid-1950s Santa had become the leading sales consultant for numerous other companies and products. Today, he is one of the biggest sellers at Christmas and appears in adverts on television, the internet, billboards, and shop fronts.Public health needs to be aware of what giant multinational capitalists  realised long ago: that Santa sells, and sometimes he sells harmful products.

3.  Issue of smoking in movies and influence on kids to start. Good article at As You Sow.


Erratum in

  • JAMA 1992 Oct 21;268(15):2034.



To determine if RJR Nabisco's cartoon-theme advertising is more effective in promoting Camel cigarettes to children or to adults. To determine if children see, remember, and are influenced by cigarette advertising.


Use of four standard marketing measures to compare the effects of Camel's Old Joe cartoon advertising on children and adults.


High school students, grades 9 through 12, from five regions of the United States, and adults, aged 21 years and over, from Massachusetts.


Recognition of Camel's Old Joe cartoon character, product and brand name recall, brand preference, appeal of advertising themes.


Children were more likely to report prior exposure to the Old Joe cartoon character (97.7% vs 72.2%; P less than .0001). Children were better able to identify the type of product being advertised (97.5% vs 67.0%; P less than .0001) and the the Camel cigarette brand name (93.6% vs 57.7%; P less than .0001). Children also found the Camel cigarette advertisements more appealing (P less than .0001). Camel's share of the illegal children's cigarette market segment has increased from 0.5% to 32.8%, representing sales estimated at $476 million per year.


Old Joe Camel cartoon advertisements are far more successful at marketing Camel cigarettes to children than to adults. This finding is consistent with tobacco industry documents that indicate that a major function of tobacco advertising is to promote and maintain tobacco addiction among children.




"In Eric Schlosser’s book Fast-Food Nation: The Darkside of an All-American Meal, it talks about a study that found that 96% of American children could correctly identify Ronald McDonald.  The only fictional character with higher rates of identification was Santa Claus!" Ronald McDonald vs. Santa Claus



Tobacco Advertising History

You can see more tobacco advertisements by contacting the Center for the Study of Tobacco and Society, or by visiting and

Profiles Of Key Players

Mike Moore (left) and Bob Butterworth (right).  Credit: Jamal Wilson/AFP/Getty Images

One of the major figures in the tobacco case is now governor of Washington, while another sits in a Kentucky jail. Read more about the people involved in the settlement.

Joe Camel.
EnlargeCourtesy of

As part of the 1998 settlement, the tobacco industry agreed to do away with some its most famous advertising icons, such as Joe Camel.

Joe Camel.
Courtesy of

As part of the 1998 settlement, the tobacco industry agreed to do away with some its most famous advertising icons, such as Joe Camel.

More From This Series

Wednesday on Morning Edition, in the last installment of this series about the 1998 tobacco settlement, Debbie Elliott will consider the future of the tobacco industry with a visit to Philip Morris' Center for Research and Technology in Richmond, Va.

In previous reports, Elliott looked at what states have done with the tobacco funds and gave an overview of changes that have taken place since the settlement.

text size AAA
November 18, 2008

For decades, tobacco companies used cartoon characters to sell cigarettes. During the 1960s, Winston sponsored The Flintstones, and Fred himself sang the indelible jingle, "Winston tastes good, like a cigarette should." And for audience members who were too young to smoke, Flintstone candy cigarettes came in pink with Wilma on the pack and green (menthol) with Barney.

In 1971, Congress banned broadcast ads by tobacco companies — but it still allowed print and billboards.

"[Advertising] went on right through the 1990s," says Dr. Alan Blum, director of the Center for the Study of Tobacco and Society at the University of Alabama, home to a vast tobacco marketing archive. A family physician, Blum has spent his career documenting how, for generations, the tobacco industry made smoking appealing.

"My father was a family doctor," Blum recalls. "And when we would be watching the Dodger games in Brooklyn, he would get very upset, and I found out he was upset because in the background you could see the billboard for Lucky Strikes. If you were a Dodger fan you were for Luckies. If you were for the Giants, you were a Chesterfield smoker. If you were for the New York Yankees, you were for Camels."

Mixed Reviews

Ten years ago, much of that stopped. The tobacco industry agreed to do away with some of its most famous advertising icons.

"The Marlboro Man will be riding into the sunset on Joe Camel," Bob Butterworth said in the late 1990s.

Butterworth was Florida's attorney general, and the marketing restrictions were part of a $246 billion settlement between Big Tobacco and states that had sued the industry over the public health costs of smoking.

The settlement changed the way cigarettes are marketed. The public no longer sees tobacco advertised on billboards, or on taxicabs and buses. Sports sponsorships have been limited. And cigarette companies cannot use cartoon characters, or give away brand-name merchandise like T-shirts and backpacks.

Since 1998, smoking rates have dropped by 5 percentage points, falling below 20 percent for adults in 2007 for the first time since the government started collecting the data.

Still, the settlement gets mixed reviews. Blum says he does not see it as a watershed in the tobacco wars.

"To play this as some kind of victory over Big Tobacco really overlooks what it did and didn't do," Blum says. "It was a money grab."

Blum says the deal simply shifted money from tobacco companies to states — many of which then failed to use it to fight smoking. Instead, he says, the states became dependent on the funds to build roads or schools or repay debt.

"It's a bad deal," Blum says.

But Mike Moore, former Mississippi attorney general and a lead negotiator in the deal, defends the agreement. He says if nothing else, the lawsuits brought to light the fact that tobacco companies knew that cigarettes were deadly and addictive. Still, he acknowledges the industry is a formidable opponent, especially when it comes to creating a market.

"They still have a marketing campaign," Moore says. "They're all over the place. They have other ways to do it. They're coming out with new products. They'll find a way to sell their product. Addiction is what they sell. It's an amazing process. Think about it. You sell a product. People get hooked on it. They have to have it. You're in business forever."

'One-To-One Approach'

In the years since the settlement, tobacco firms have found new ways to reach customers. The companies are barred from sponsoring concerts, but on the Web, Philip Morris sponsors an American Idol-like band contest in a promotion called "The Best of Marlboro Country Music." There are promotions in night clubs, on college campuses, on the Internet and at the stores where cigarettes are sold.

"It's evolved to a more focused, direct one-to-one approach," says Bill Phelps, a spokesman for Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris, which is the world's top cigarette maker. "When was the last time you saw an ad for Marlboro? Marlboro is the biggest brand in the U.S., as big as the next 10 brands combined. I think there's still a perception that [people] see Marlboro advertising a great deal, but take a step back and think about it."

Phelps says the company tries to prevent exposure for unintended audiences, like children, by relying on direct marketing.

"Our database has more than 25 million names on it," he says. "Those are adults who already smoke and have said, 'I want to be on your database and receive information from you about your cigarette brands.'"

It all starts at, which "has a system that enables us to verify who somebody is, who tries to sign up on the database, to make sure they are who they say they are and they are an adult," Phelps says.

Philip Morris uses the database to target smokers for discount coupons and even chances to win a vacation in what Phelps calls "experiential programs."

"Marlboro brand is often associated with Marlboro Country, and the great outdoors and the West," he says. "We own a ranch, and Marlboro smokers can win an opportunity to visit that ranch and experience Marlboro Country."

Marlboro now has a record 41.8 percent share of the U.S. cigarette market, up from 33.8 percent when the settlement was signed. Overall, tobacco companies spend more than $13 billion a year on advertising and promotions, nearly double what they did in 1998.

David Versus Goliath

Another result of the tobacco settlement was the creation of the nonprofit American Legacy Foundation to fight smoking, requiring the tobacco industry to pay the organization $1.7 billion over 10 years. The foundation runs campaigns to discourage teen smoking.

"We try to make it possible for young people to rebel by rejecting Big Tobacco as opposed to rebel by becoming a smoker," says Legacy President Cheryl Healton.

In one Legacy TV commercial, a cowboy rides into New York City traffic on a white horse and pulls a bandanna from his neck, revealing a big hole that he then sings through:

You don't always die from tobacco —
Sometimes you just lose a lung.
You don't always die from tobacco —
Sometimes they snip out your tongue.

In another ad, teenagers dump 1,200 body bags in a pile outside a cigarette company's office — the number of people who die every day of tobacco-related diseases. These kinds of edgy messages are effective, but Healton says that the foundation's annual budget of $55 million is dwarfed by Big Tobacco's resources.

"When you consider that the tobacco industry spends about $36 million every day marketing its product in the U.S. alone, our Truth campaign buy is roughly equal, for example, to one day of their marketing effort," she says. "So it's truly a David vs. Goliath battle."

But, Healton adds, "We have truth on our side."

This series was produced for broadcast by Marisa Penaloza.

CDC Vital Signs. Learn vital information about smoking and health. Read CDC Vital Signs. Smoking/